JanVayu Blog · Fact check

CBSE has dropped Environmental Education from Class 10 for the 2027-28 batch, and the circular leaves one question open

Published: 1 November 2026 | Author: Team JanVayu | Reading time: 4 min


On 29 October the Central Board of Secondary Education issued circular Acad-70/2026 on the subjects Class 9 students will study as they move into Class 10. News reports led with one line from it: Environmental Education is out. A post on X by Warrior Moms, which reached us as a screenshot, said that a curriculum cannot claim to prepare children for the future while pushing environmental education to the margins, at a time of escalating air pollution. That is an argument, and a reasonable one for a clean-air platform to take seriously. Before anyone repeats it, here is what the circular itself says.

What the circular says

The sentence that matters is in paragraph (i). It says that the subject "Individuals in Society" and the "Modules of CT & AI" in Class IX (2026-27), and the subject "Environmental Education" in Class X (2027-28), "shall not be the part of the curriculum for these batches". CT & AI is Computational Thinking and Artificial Intelligence.

Three things follow from the text.

What it does not say

The circular does not say whether Environmental Education returns for later batches. CBSE's Secondary Curriculum 2026-27, Part 1, lists the subject, assessed by the school, in its scheme for 2027-28 and 2028-29. We saw that document only as a search excerpt, so we cannot say how it reads in full. The circular overrides it for this batch, and says nothing we found about the batches after it.

It also does not say whether environmental content continues inside other subjects, such as Science and Social Science, for this batch. We did not find the answer in the circular, and we have not checked the subject syllabuses. Anyone who writes that children will get no environmental learning in Class 10 is going beyond what the document says. Anyone who writes that nothing has changed is as well.

Why it matters for air

In our view, clean-air policy works better when people can read an air quality index, tell a seasonal spike from a lasting change, and ask what a policy did. Schools are one place those skills can be taught, and a Class 10 year without a named subject for environmental learning is a gap for one batch of students, whatever happens to later ones. That is our judgement and not a finding from the circular.

How large that gap is depends on facts we do not have: how many schools were teaching the subject well, what its internal assessment looked like in practice, and what replaces it in the timetable. The circular does not tell us, and we have not seen data on any of these.

What to ask


Sources

Share WhatsApp X LinkedIn Telegram Email